Monday, April 5, 2010

Cutting programs for Florida's kids is bad business


Blog Image
Bob Gabordi is executive editor of the Tallahassee Democrat and Tallahassee.com. He can be reached through this blog, at bgabordi@tallahassee.com or (850) 599-2177

Lawmakers and other politicians are fond of saying that government should be run like a business, watching expenses and revenues carefully, making sure there is a healthy bottom line.

When it comes time to cut the budget, they say, they must make the hard decisions, comparing their work to that of families trying hard to make ends meet with fewer dollars.

They would have us believe that they run government with the efficiency of a business and balance the budget with the care of a family.

Who do they think they are fooling?

A series of stories this week in the Tallahassee Democrat is examining the status of children across Florida and how they are faring in the Legislature. It is a first step in trying to hold lawmakers and other government officials accountable for their votes on children’s issues, which rarely get this kind of attention in the state media.

After this session, we’ll announce a list of children’s heroes and villains based on how they voted and what issues lawmakers supported.

If government were truly being run as a business, the managers would see the state’s children not as expenses to be cut, but as investments with high rates of return. They would be nurtured as a way to obtain greater future wealth, avoid even bigger future expenses and the best way to grow the bottom line.

If government truly faced the task of cutting with the same care that families do, cutting things for our children would be the last place most moms and dads would go. My mom would have gone hungry herself – and probably did on more than one occasion – rather than send us off to school without proper clothing or the paper and pencils we needed to achieve success. We were poor, but my mom made sure we had our medical needs taken care of.

With infants in this state dying at alarming rates, state lawmakers are considering eliminating Healthy Start programs designed to keep babies alive. House Health Care leader Republican Denise Grimsley, in an interview with our reporter Jim Ash, explained the decision this way: “pregnancy is a choice.”

Excuse me, but it’s not a choice for the child.

Infant mortality rates in Florida are abysmal, especially for black babies. Here is the reality: For every 1,000 babies born in Florida, more than 7 won’t reach their first birthday. For black babies, the infant mortality rate can be as high as 2.5 times the number of white babies.

A choice?

It’s not just Healthy Start under siege in the Legislature; it’s children’s programs in general. Lawmakers have raided children’s trust funds even as cutting funding for our kids’ education and health.

Sen. President Jeff Atwater, who wants to be able to get elected the state’s chief financial officer by telling voters he cut our taxes, suggests children’s programs are no different than any others, and lots of programs are getting cut.

Running government like a business? Study after study has shown that investing in children’s programs upfront saves several times that in the long haul by reducing demands on the health-care system, helping children succeed in school and keeping children out of the juvenile justice system. Businesses that won’t invest in their future end up out of business, but that won’t happen in government.

Meanwhile, children’s advocates complain that they don’t get the kind of access to leadership as the big-money corporate lobbyists.

In October, I facilitated a public forum on issues facing children sponsored by the Children’s Campaign. In closing the session, I said the problem is that parents today tend to focus too much of our time on teaching our children to play nicely and modeling good behavior. Maybe our kids would be better served if we acted up a little, teaching them about their rights to assembly and to redress grievances to our government.


Playing nicely hasn’t gotten children in this state – or their parents – much of anywhere. That is, unless you consider it OK for thousands – one estimate is 17,000 – of children with disabilities to have to wait for state services.

Next week is an opportunity for parents to change the equation: It’s Children’s Week at the Capitol. It’s an opportunity for advocates of children’s issues to let lawmakers know what they think and to allow them to hear firsthand from our kids.

You can send your comments by clicking the button below, e-mailing me at bgabordi@tallahassee.com, sending a private message on Tallahassee.com, Twitter @bgabordi, LinkedIn or Blogger.com. You can also find links to my blogs on Facebook but you have to request to be my friend.

Monday, March 29, 2010

If you support openness, Mr. Mayor, advocate for this bill

Blog Image
Bob Gabordi is executive editor of the Tallahassee Democrat and Tallahassee.com. He can be reached through this blog, at bgabordi@tallahassee.com or (850) 599-2177

An open-government bill, SB 1598, passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee Friday containing many, but not all, of the improvements to the law recommended by Gov. Charlie Crist’s Commission on Open Government Reform.

It remains to be seen if a House companion bill, HB 1211, goes anywhere – it has not yet – or if the House will take up a bill on the floor should SB 1598 sponsored by Republican Sen. Paula Dockery pass the Senate.

The current version of the bill, the Open Government Act, still combines the open-meetings law and the public-records law into one act; makes uniform penalties for intentional violations; and limits some of the fees government may charge citizens for accessing, copying and redacting public records.

For example, the bill would allow an agency to charge for personnel time only if a request to inspect or copy public records requires more than 30 minutes of an employee’s time. It also does not allow for charging the public to redact personal records comingled with public records.

The bill has faced opposition from the Florida League of Cities, which is headed by Tallahassee Mayor John Marks. Provisions in the bill that would have reduced the costs agencies may pass along to citizens were opposed by the League. Marks called that an “unfunded mandate.”

To overcome the League’s objections, some of provisions opposed by the League have been removed.

Rebecca O’Hara, legislative director for the League, said the League is “comfortable with the direction” of the bill.

“The issues that remain are fairly minor,” she said, primarily having to do with the awarding of attorney fees.

O’Hara said she would be more comfortable if the bill allowed judges to use their discretion on whether a plaintiff who successfully sued for violations of the law must awarded fees. She would also like to see agencies allowed to recover their costs in frivolous lawsuits brought against government.

Changes in the bill were made to make it more palatable to the League, although O’Hara said the League did not testify in committee.

In a column last week in the Tallahassee Democrat, Mayor Marks implied that I had erred in my reporting of the facts in a previous blog on the topic, although he gave no examples of factual errors.

The mayor also said he was “a strong advocate for transparency and openness in government, and I have more than proven this commitment to Florida's Sunshine Laws,” although he gave no examples of his advocacy, either.

The current bill is an improvement over what we have now, but I think it falls short of hitting the mark.

As proposed by the governor’s commission, this bill would have given all citizens – the poor as well as the wealthy – an equal ability to have access to government records. Some local governments and agencies have charged outrageous fees that make access to their government’s records a reality only to those who can afford it.

I disagree that this is an "unfunded mandate."

Calling it that is akin to calling the 24th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution an “unfunded mandate.” For those of you who weren’t alive then – or missed that lesson in history – until that amendment was ratified by 38 states in 1964, the poll tax – a fee assessed on citizens wishing to vote – was a way Southern states made it difficult for poor people, primarily blacks, to vote when the Reconstruction era ended.

Don’t think for a second that all governments today welcome openness and access by citizens, although all will say they do. This is not ancient history. Here’s a particularly egregious example, but I could have picked from dozens of other incidents:

A year ago, a Tallahassee Democrat reporter who happens to be African-American, requested a public record from a small county government in the Big Bend area. After being asked numerous questions on her motivation for requesting the document, which by itself is illegal, she was followed to her car where her license plate was written down and run through law enforcement checks, presumably to see if she was wanted for a crime.

These days it is as nearly as popular for politicians to call themselves “advocates for transparency” as it is for businesses to say they are “green.” No one wants to be viewed as being against either.

But you have to do more than simply follow the law to be an advocate for transparency. Some Tallahassee residents, for example, would question just how transparent our city government was when the city commission quietly passed “deferred compensation” increasing pay to commissioners five years ago or when it took away citizens’ right to vote in a special election last year.

I look at it this way: Which would have cost taxpayers more, the city paying a greater share of the cost of open access to government or the last five years of deferred compensation? Tell me, which way would truly be in the best interest of city taxpayers?

If the mayor wants to be seen as an advocate for open government and easy citizen access to government, he needs to get onboard in pushing for Senate and House passage of the latest version of the bill, and he would push the League to do the same.

That's what an advocate for open government would do.

You can send your comments by clicking the button below, e-mailing me at bgabordi@tallahassee.com, sending a private message on Tallahassee.com, Twitter @bgabordi, LinkedIn or Blogger.com. You can also find links to my blogs on Facebook but you have to request to be my friend.

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Let's leave well enough alone on Fla. 911 tapes

log Home | Write New Post | View/Edit Posts | Approve Comments | Blog Settings
Blog Image
Bob Gabordi is executive editor of the Tallahassee Democrat and Tallahassee.com. He can be reached through this blog, at bgabordi@tallahassee.com or (850) 599-2177

With due respect, this is just dumb.

The House Governmental Affairs Policy Committee is considering a proposal that would exempt 911 tapes from Florida's public-records laws, although it would provide a transcript after 60 days.

Talk about unwarranted government intrusion.

One little question: Why?

We asked my Facebook friends and fans of Tallahassee.com what they thought of the proposal.

Inane was a common answer.

Natalie Napier spoke for a lot of people when she said this: “Well duh! The last thing I'm thinking about when my house is on fire is it becoming a public record.”

Are there some circumstances, such as domestic violence, when knowing the general public might find out could cause someone to be inhibited? Maybe, but those are few and far between. And if that’s the goal, propose that and let’s debate that. But don’t put a blanket on all instances.

If the legislators truly want to make government more efficient let’s start with focusing on fixing what’s broken, and not breaking what’s fixed. Florida’s open-records laws work well. Don’t mess them up.
You can send your comments by clicking the button below, e-mailing me at bgabordi@tallahassee.com, sending a private message on Tallahassee.com, Twitter @bgabordi, LinkedIn or Blogger.com
. You can also find links to my blogs on Facebook but you have to request to be my friend.

Monday, March 1, 2010

My quarter says Gov. Crist won't talk about these things

Blog Image
Bob Gabordi is executive editor of the Tallahassee Democrat and Tallahassee.com. He can be reached through this blog, at bgabordi@tallahassee.com or (850) 599-2177

The start of our second season in Tallahassee – in between football seasons -- the legislative session officially begins this week with the State of the State address Tuesday, the last such address of Gov. Charlie Crist, a candidate for the U.S. Senate.

Here’s a quarter that says the governor will exude optimism about the future of Florida, while acknowledging these are tough times. That same quarter says he will tell us the state’s economists are projecting growth – for the first time in years – but that the worst is not over.

Here’s another quarter that he doesn’t mention that our children are falling further behind and that more and more of their parents can’t even so much as look for work – even if it could be found – because wait lists for quality child care centers grow longer and longer.

In April, during Children’s Week at the Capitol, the Tallahassee Democrat will publish a comprehensive look at the state of Florida’s children, while watching closely how lawmakers vote on bills to either help or hurt our kids.

Nothing could have been a more pointed reminder for state workers than the sudden announced closing of the Gwen Cherry Child Development Center, which shuts down April 30. Sponsored by the state Department of Education, the center served the families of state employees for 25 years.

If money is the issue, parents offered to increase their fees. So it isn’t money.

What then?

Parents were given six weeks to find new arrangements and, guess what? Child care is already in short supply. The Early Learning Coalition of the Big Bend has a long wait list to get into child care facilities.

In a letter from Whole Child Leon to Crist, WCL’s steering committee said:

“One of Whole Child’s goals is to increase the number of quality child-care sources in our community, with a particular emphasis on encouraging and incentivizing employers to provide site-based care for their employees. As the largest employer in our community, state government should be expanding these options, and the State Department of Education should be leading the way.”

Here’s another quarter that says the governor won’t talk about the growing numbers of homeless, including children, living on our streets or in temporary shelters, resulting in part from the Florida unemployment rate hitting a record 12 percent.

What happens next, when the federal stimulus money runs out? Have we used it to generate economic growth or a Band Aid® to cover the hurt?

Will the governor include in the State of the State the number of people our universities have sent packing, people of talent and intellect, the type of economic-development generating talent we need now and well into the future?

In a column Sunday in the Tallahassee Democrat, Senate President Jeff Atwater said the focus of the Legislature should not be on how to increase revenues as it tries to balance the budget. He said we need to be “investing in programs that improve our job market and create new jobs.”

A quick translation of that says: Our children, our universities and schools, the homeless and others who might be considered the weakest links in our societal chain are in even deeper muck. It is an admission that three years of consecutive budget cuts already worth $7 billion has not helped stimulate the economy or fix what is broken, yet leadership is looking at $3 billion more this session. It is a further admission that all we have done is talk of investing in job growth, not actually creating jobs.

I’ve got one more quarter that says the governor won’t say that, either.

You can send your comments by clicking the button below, e-mailing me at bgabordi@tallahassee.com, sending a private message on Tallahassee.com, Twitter @bgabordi, LinkedIn or Blogger.com. You can also find links to my blogs on Facebook but you have to request to be my friend.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Commission, this is bad policy and bad politics

Blog Image
Bob Gabordi is executive editor of the Tallahassee Democrat and Tallahassee.com. He can be reached through this blog, at bgabordi@tallahassee.com or (850) 599-2177

It would be easy enough for me to go on a rant about what is clearly an attack not only on the right to freedom of speech but also the right to petition the government “for a redress of grievances.”

But I won’t. If anyone does, I understand how difficult it is for you to sit quietly while others attack what you stand for and, especially when they do so in a manner that you believe is abusive and unfair. It happens to me almost every day, and it will happen again after this is published.

Someone, maybe several someones, will Zing!, e-mail or otherwise seek to publish their views, which will be just the opposite of mine. Some will get published, others not – but their viewpoints will still be expressed. What to do? Speak up to defend your position, but don't lash out and don't limit access to the podium.

The message of this should not be lost on the Tallahassee City Commission or the city’s attorney, Jim English: In politics and the media, we work for the people – even those who so disagree with us they want us replaced – and not the other way around.

When they address us, it is our privilege and their right. English seems to make a habit of getting these things backward. He recently talked about limiting citizens' “privilege” to address the commission.

Furthermore, sending e-mails and letters to public employees does not abuse the system; it is exactly the system the Founding Fathers envisioned. Even if they didn’t know about the Internet, they knew about strongly held opinions; they went to war over theirs.

So, before I start to rant on the topic – which would be easy for me to do – let me switch gears by asking members of the City Commission this: What are you thinking? Politically, I mean?

Not only is your reaction bad public policy, it's bad politics, too. You have taken one person’s 15 seconds of fame and turned it into a month of Sundays by lashing out. Stay on this same path, and you will turn it into a full term on the commission.

Let me be specific: Erwin Jackson, who is running against recently appointed Commissioner Gil Ziffer, has raised a couple important points, notably on deferred compensation. That’s an issue on which most of us, I suspect, would agree with Jackson. The commission shouldn’t have done what it did five years ago, and it should better understand the public outcry against it now.

That has had nothing to do with Ziffer, except this: The commission is starting to look more and more like a privileged private club instead of an elected body of the people. From where I sit out here in the masses, this is what it looks like:

  • First vote yourself an increase in compensation in what can only be described as a cleverly quiet manner
  • Then change the charter to appoint a member rather than allow the people to decide
  • And now your attorney is looking at ways to limit the speech of those who disagree with you.

Perhaps instead of worrying about and lamenting Jackson’s behavior, the commission should take a hard look at its own. With commissioners' help, that one trick pony is starting to look more and more like Secretariat.

You can send your comments by clicking the button below, e-mailing me at bgabordi@tallahassee.com, sending a private message on Tallahassee.com, Twitter @bgabordi, LinkedIn or Blogger.com. You can also find links to my blogs on Facebook but you have to request to be my friend.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Whatever this is, don't call it justice

Blog Image
Bob Gabordi is executive editor of the Tallahassee Democrat and Tallahassee.com. He can be reached through this blog, at bgabordi@tallahassee.com or (850) 599-2177

This is what happens when documents are closed to the public and those closest to the information are ordered to be quiet or face contempt-of-court charges. I don’t know what to call it, but it’s not my idea of justice.

Andrea Green, who by multiple accounts is the man who shot Rachel Hoffman multiple times – including in the head, even shooting through her arms that she used to try to protect herself – was allowed to plead no contest to second-degree murder. He will spend the rest of his life in prison.

Deneilo Bradshaw, who watched as the murder took place and benefited from robbing Hoffman and killing her, is found guilty of first-degree murder and robbery after being convicted by a jury. He will spend the rest of his life in prison.

Some will say Hoffman was a less-than-sympathetic victim, and perhaps that is so. She was a recent Florida State University graduate with a history of dealing pot before she went to work for Tallahassee police as a confidential informant.

Still it is hard to justify why defendant Bradshaw – the one with the smaller role in her murder – gets first-degree murder and defendant Green – whose history of violent crimes makes your skin crawl – gets second-degree murder.

It gets harder to justify when you think of that night, with Hoffman – still alive and, as I said, trying to protect herself with her arms and hands against bullets – being shot time and again by Green. At his hearing, Green smiled and joked throughout.

To try to shed some light on all of this, the Tallahassee Democrat is now – still – pursuing the release of all evidence in the two cases, as well as previously undisclosed transmissions and text messages between police and Hoffman the night she was killed.

After Green entered his plea in court Wednesday, his attorney, Assistant Public Defender Ines Suber, said: "Obviously, it's a victory (for) the defense." The goal, she said, was to eliminate the death penalty.

It is the same reason Suber sought to shut out public scrutiny in Franklin County, where a grandmother faces murder charges in the death of her 5-year-old grandson. It is easier to cut the best deal in secrecy. It has nothing to do with real justice.

And the prosecutor in the Green case, Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman, said, the state was not surprised by Green’s plea of no contest to second-degree murder.

"It's something we've been working on for a long time," she said.

All of which raises the question of whether the need for secrecy in this case really had anything to do with either justice or a fair trial, since it seems everyone was working to avoid any trial at all. If it was about justice, how could anyone agree that Bradshaw deserves a harsher outcome than Green? And if it was about a fair trial, well, let there be one instead of working “for a long time” on how to avoid one.

Maybe the need for secrecy really was about keeping the public silent while deals were being made. Maybe it is just about winning and losing, with justice an old-fashioned consideration of the naïve who still believe in it.

Maybe, in the end, winning and losing is justice these days. And maybe State Attorney Willie Meggs hit the nail solidly on the head by saying it really doesn’t matter in the end.

“What we are trying to seek is justice. It's hard to say if anybody likes this or dislikes it. If we had gotten a sentence of death, it's not like Rachel's going to come back."

True enough, but let’s call it winning and losing and playing the game how it must be played so your side wins. Let’s just not call it justice.

You can send your comments by clicking the button below, e-mailing me at bgabordi@tallahassee.com, sending a private message on Tallahassee.com, Twitter @bgabordi, LinkedIn or Blogger.com. You can also find links to my blogs on Facebook but you have to request to be my friend.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Tebow and free speech Part II

Blog Image
Bob Gabordi is executive editor of the Tallahassee Democrat and Tallahassee.com. He can be reached through this blog, at bgabordi@tallahassee.com or (850) 599-2177

Tebow and free speech Part II

My post on freedom-of-speech issues in the controversy over Tim Tebow’s Super Bowl commercial generated a lot of discussion. Some people question how 30 seconds of air time that costs more than $2.5 million can be considered “free speech.”

So did the Supreme Court for a long time. After all, many scholars believe the Founding Fathers were thinking about political speech, not commercials to get you buy toothpaste. (OK, maybe toothpaste didn’t come into broad use for a few more years. Maybe a nice set of George Washington wooden teeth would have been a better example.)

But all that changed in the last part of the 20th century when the courts offered greater protections under the First Amendment to commercial speech.

Still, that shouldn’t matter here. Nor should CBS’ inconsistency in deciding which ads it accepts. That’s for CBS to decide and for the rest of us to criticize. Advertisers are buying the right to express their viewpoint or pitch their product; they are buying access to CBS’ viewers. The difference in that seems to be lost on some people. But they are two totally different things.

Tebow’s ad – if it is anything like what we’re being told – is closer to political speech than commercial speech anyway. That the ultra conservative group Focus on the Family is paying for access to CBS’ viewers shouldn’t matter.

Critics say CBS refused an ad from the United Church of Christ in support of gay and lesbian membership in the UCC in 2004 on the grounds that it was too controversial.

Don’t you just hate it when the “liberal media” goes all Rush Limbaugh on us? Come on, CBS, what are we supposed to do with all those “liberal media” bumper stickers?

Personally, if I were king of CBS, I would accept them all. I’d just keep raising the price of the ad spots to weed out those who really don’t want to reach my audience. Hey, this is such a totally American event, a day to eat, drink and celebrate who and what we are: couch potatoes. What’s so wrong with a little political free speech and a lot of capitalism added in?

Does CBS really think that a little political controversy is going to stop Americans from watching football? I highly doubt it, but that’s for CBS to decide. Until I’m the king.

You can send your comments by clicking the button below, e-mailing me at bgabordi@tallahassee.com, sending a private message on Tallahassee.com, Twitter @bgabordi, LinkedIn or Blogger.com.

You can also find links to my blogs on Facebook but you have to request to be my friend.